Sunday, July 6, 2008

(Red) ikal Noise

I'd feel somewhat remiss if I left off without saying anything, if only brief, concerning some of the themes in the last entry. The story is partially about solitude. Both hers and the protagonist's. His is very self imposed -- hers is undoubtedly tied to her situation, but, in a way, equally self imposed. His solitude is a product of boredom and also his feeling that he's swept up in a life in which he doesn't really belong. Hers is a product of shame. She's HIV positive. She feels marked, dirty, cursed, and a danger to those around her.

Realistically, however, most people in her situation would NOT necessarily feel or act this way. Practically speaking, the odds of a HIV positive person passing on HIV are extremely low. Unprotected, we're talking one in three hundred. Protected, one in three thousand. The odds get a little worse depending on your preferences (lol buttsex), but never much worse than one in a hundred. Even "very" risky behavior such as needle jousting only yields a one in fifty chance to pass on the bug. HIV is just not very good at infecting humans. Once it manages to take hold, yeah, you're (sorta) fucked. But it's a fragile bug -- the virus dies immediately on being exposed to air; spilled blood from an infected person is very unlikely to be dangerous.

The point is that many and probably most infected people remain sexually active and simply make sure they always use protection. Some inform their partners, some don't. Becoming infected might change your sex life, but it doesn't necessarily mark it's end. Realistically, when it comes to diseases you might get off some random at a club, HIV ranks lower than most in overall risk.

On the topic of HIV's effect on reproduction, the risk of passing the virus to children is actually quite low if the mother has access to top medical care. Mother to child transmission, even ignored, is one in ten, but practically should never happen if the mother is getting top medical attention. It's still a reasonably big deal as the treatment given to the child is pretty hard on the infant's body and can require lots of additional medical attention. (Liver failure from the PEP etc)

I think the latest story perhaps gives the impression that, if you sleep with a HIV positive person, you're fucked. Not really. In the event that you do end up being exposed to the virus, you should immediately seek medical care, and if you do so within days of the exposure, a PEP can almost entirely eradicate any chance of infection.

I don't like talking about serious shit very often, but the amount of misinformation on HIV out there is gigantic, and I don't want to feel like I added to it. ^^

If you're ugly, fat, or particularly boring, this isn't directed at you.

"When God gives you aids, make lemonaids"

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

lol wut

Robert said...

Dicks bro? Ironic?

Niiva said...

You're done man. I'm pretty sure cool people call it HiVir atm.

Anonymous said...

You better be kidding

uhlexiul said...

Incorrect.

Cool people call it "that high five."

Hi (Greetings!)

V (As in the roman numeral)

HiFive

ZeGuga said...

I've posted here maybe what, once, twice? Only on dumb shit like wow, no noir posts, even though I enjoyed them.

This is different from your usual dicky self though.

Good thing you have an awareness of what people percieve the virus to be, and how misinformed they are.

Brilliant (aspiring?) writer, moral poster and entertaining gamer. Oh yeah, and douchebag finance guy. Sweet package. Give me some of that dick.

Anonymous said...

and knowledge is power!

Anonymous said...

I guess most doctors would prefer this info not get out due to the "carefree" some people might adopt knowing the chances of passing it on is pretty low.

Zyla said...

Well said, although I'm curious to ask where you got your inspiration for all of this.

Anonymous said...

In my opinion, a writer should never explain his writings. Leave it open to interpretation, let it stir some debate. Just because you wrote it with a certain intention or theme in mind doesn't mean it can't touch someone else in a different, unexpected way. Moreso, I think only good texts achieve this and are able to be interpreted in many different ways, making sense for all of them - bad texts are obvious.

ninjachief (emo and full of rage) said...

if you leave me (yes, you know what i mean) its going to come with a 1 in 1 chance of you getting the bug

im just saying

i have my ways

neilyo said...

guy above me, thats stupid, ambiguity does not equal depth. geniuses like tagore and kurt vonnegut wrote exactly what they meant, not what you think they could possibly mean. attaching artificial meaning onto lifeless works makes it easier for brainless shits to pretend their writing is worth being passed on

Anonymous said...

tl;dr, who has aids? its you.

Anonymous said...

"If you're ugly, fat, or particularly boring, this isn't directed at you."

I thought that went for your whole blog?

Anonymous said...

raddy you need to sort out your "its" and "it's", no apostrophe for the possessive, only for the shortening of "it is".

Anonymous said...

Hypothetically, how pissed would you be if someone copied all your blogs to gameriot?

Implant said...

Raddy, come back to burning blaids!

Anonymous said...

Could you post the source of your info, please?

Anonymous said...

can we get a poker game in nyc already?

on wendsdays there is decent game on 32nd and 2nd.

get ming in on this too


thoughts?

Jeremy said...

What Neilyo said was completely true.

Don't listen to people telling you that you have to be ambiguous, that you have to show not tell. You don't have to try to be pretentious to be "great" as Mr. Interpolation would have you be. Your style is your style and it alone is great.

After all, Hemingway:

"He went to the river. The river was there."

Good post. Keep it up, keep refining.

Romulox said...

maybe a reference on some of this information, so its not just what Raddy says vs. What I have assumed since 5th grade sex ed?

no offense... i love your site (and maybe you LOL). its just the engineer in me that wants more hard facts before i believe something.

Raddy said...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV

See the chart lower down the page. The numbers there don't exactly agree with what I've heard, but they are generally of the same nature. (The odds are lower than I listed)

I don't have a direct source for the numbers I provided. Mostly word of mouth from friends in the field and doctors I worked with back when I was premed. (a lifetime ago) I think the data generally speaks for itself though. (check the wiki or google around a bit)

Larocca said...

"Her eyes burned in the way that eyes do when sleep-heavy eyes cry"

Eh on this sentence. Get rid of one of the 'eyes' somehow or another.

Oh and, the daughter is a succubus. Thats awesome.

Anonymous said...

A 1 in 300 chance of passing the virus with unprotected sex is cleary wrong. Firstly you don't specify variables like circumcision, how dry the girl is (rape) and where the guy cums.

In a typical African culture where the man "takes" his woman and ejaculates inside her, there is more chance of the virus being passed than not. HIV is out of control in africa and still rising in almost all developed countries including the USA. A 1 in 300 transmission rate would imply that the disease would see a decline in our societies since i highly doubt the average HIV positive person has sex anywhere near 300 times with the disease.

Raddy said...

@ anon - no